In a major relief to Kerala Congress (Skariah Thomas) and several other regional parties, the Kerala High Court on Thursday stayed the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) order that had delisted them from the roster of Registered Political Parties and shifted them into the category of Registered Unrecognised Political Parties (Delisted RUPPs).
The interim order ensures that these parties will be able to contest the upcoming local body elections without any disruption caused by the ECI’s delisting decision.
The order was passed by Justice VG Arun in the case Kerala Congress (Skariah Thomas) v. Chief Electoral Officer & Secretary, Election Commission of India, along with several connected petitions filed by similarly affected political outfits.
Background: Why Did the ECI Delist These Parties?
The Election Commission had issued an order shifting a number of political parties— including Kerala Congress (Skariah Thomas faction)—from the list of recognised registered parties to the category of Registered Unrecognised Political Parties.
Delisting typically happens when a party:
- Fails to contest elections for an extended period
- Fails to submit mandatory annual returns
- Fails to adhere to financial disclosure norms
- Does not maintain active political participation as per ECI guidelines
The ECI’s updated categorisation had significant implications, particularly because local body elections are scheduled to take place soon in Kerala, and delisted parties risk losing access to:
- Reserved symbols
- Certain electoral privileges
- Visibility on the ECI’s list of active parties
This prompted multiple petitions to the Kerala High Court.
What the Kerala High Court Held
The High Court granted interim stay on the ECI’s decision, thereby restoring the listed status of these parties — at least until the court hears the matter in detail.
Key Observations by the Court
- The timing of the ECI’s decision — just ahead of local body elections — could adversely affect the parties’ ability to participate.
- If the delisting continued, it would irreparably prejudice the petitioning parties during the election process.
- Pending full adjudication, a temporary stay was necessary to prevent electoral injustice.
As a result, the High Court ordered that:
All delisted political parties involved in the case shall continue to be treated as Registered Political Parties for the purpose of upcoming panchayat elections.
What Does ‘Delisted RUPP’ Status Mean?
Under ECI guidelines:
- A Registered Political Party is recognised as an active participant in elections.
- A Registered Unrecognised Political Party (RUPP) is registered but does not hold recognition under ECI norms.
- A Delisted RUPP is a party that the Commission considers inactive or non-compliant.
Delisted RUPPs face restrictions such as:
- Not being eligible for a reserved election symbol
- Reduced visibility in ballot designations
- Loss of certain regulatory privileges
Thus, the High Court’s interim protection is crucial for democratic participation.
Why This Order Matters Ahead of Kerala Panchayat Elections
The upcoming panchayat elections are politically significant in Kerala, where smaller regional parties often play pivotal roles in coalition arrangements.
Had the delisting been allowed to operate:
- These parties would have struggled to field candidates
- Their recognition-based symbols and campaign momentum would have been compromised
- Voters could become confused due to last-minute changes in party status
By staying the ECI’s order, the Court has preserved:
- Electoral certainty
- Continuity in campaign planning
- Fair participation for all parties
Legal Issues Likely to Be Examined Next
The interim order opens the door for a detailed hearing in which the Court will examine:
1. Whether the ECI acted arbitrarily
- Was the delisting sudden?
- Were parties given adequate notice?
- Were they allowed an opportunity to comply?
2. Whether the timing of the order violated free and fair election principles
Courts have often held that electoral changes should not disrupt ongoing or imminent election processes.
3. Compliance with Sections 29A & 29C of the Representation of the People Act
These sections govern the registration and the financial reporting obligations of political parties.
4. Validity of ECI’s process
Was the methodology uniform and consistent for all parties?
The High Court’s final judgment may have broader implications for electoral administration in India, especially concerning regional and smaller political outfits.
Political Implications in Kerala
Kerala’s political landscape is heavily influenced by regional factions, and Kerala Congress factions are known for shifting alliances. The interim stay ensures:
- No disruption to alliance formations
- No confusion for voters
- No disadvantage to smaller parties vis-à-vis larger fronts like LDF and UDF
The order also protects the parties from sudden administrative disadvantage, ensuring a level playing field ahead of the polls.
Significance for Electoral Law and ECI Accountability
This case highlights growing judicial scrutiny over the Election Commission’s administrative decisions.
Courts across the country have been more willing to:
- Step in when ECI orders appear abrupt
- Ensure parties’ rights are not curtailed without due procedure
- Maintain electoral fairness and stability
This interim relief reinforces the judiciary’s role as a constitutional safeguard over electoral processes.
Conclusion
The Kerala High Court’s decision to stay the ECI’s delisting of Kerala Congress (Skariah Thomas) and several other political parties is a critical development for Kerala’s upcoming panchayat elections. By restoring these parties’ status as Registered Political Parties—even temporarily—the Court has ensured fair electoral participation and prevented potential voter confusion.
As the matter proceeds, the Court will examine the legality, timing, and procedural fairness behind the ECI’s delisting order. The final judgment may contribute significantly to the evolving jurisprudence on electoral regulation, party registration, and the limits of ECI’s administrative discretion.
Also Read
Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Rajasthan Phalodi Highway Accident: A Closer Look
