Legally present
  • Home
  • Article
  • Latest News Update
  • Law Schools
  • Supreme Court
  • Weekly Digest
Reading: Gaming Companies Challenge Tamil Nadu’s ‘Blank Hour’ and KYC Rules in Court
Share
Legally present
  • Home
  • Latest News Update
  • Supreme Court
  • Article
  • know your lawyer
  • Weekly Digest
  • Home
  • Article
  • Latest News Update
  • Law Schools
  • Supreme Court
  • Weekly Digest
Follow US
Legally Present > Latest News Update > Gaming Companies Challenge Tamil Nadu’s ‘Blank Hour’ and KYC Rules in Court
Latest News Update

Gaming Companies Challenge Tamil Nadu’s ‘Blank Hour’ and KYC Rules in Court

Last updated: 2025/03/28 at 10:04 AM
Published March 27, 2025
Share
Gaming Companies

A group of online gaming companies has moved the Madras High Court, challenging Tamil Nadu’s new gaming regulations that mandate Aadhaar-based KYC verification and enforce a midnight-to-dawn gaming ban (12 AM – 5 AM) for real money games.

Contents
Gaming Industry Calls Regulations Arbitrary and UnconstitutionalKey Contentions of Gaming Companies:State Defends Gaming RestrictionsWhat’s Next?

The bench of Justice SM Subramaniam and Justice K Rajasekar has issued notices to the State and Union Governments, seeking a response within two weeks, but has not granted any interim relief.

Gaming Industry Calls Regulations Arbitrary and Unconstitutional

The petition challenges Section 5(2) and Section 14(1)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Online Gambling and Regulation of Online Games Act, 2022, along with Regulation 4(iii) and 4(viii) of the Tamil Nadu Online Gaming Authority (Real Money Games) Regulations, 2025.

Key Contentions of Gaming Companies:

🔹 State Cannot Override Central IT Laws: Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi argued that online gaming regulations fall under the IT Act, a central law, making Tamil Nadu’s gaming restrictions legally invalid.

🔹 Skill-Based Games Cannot Be Restricted: Senior Advocate Sajan Poovayya emphasized that rummy is a game of skill, and restricting it violates Article 19(1)(g) (right to trade and profession).

🔹 Right to Privacy Violated: The mandatory Aadhaar-linked KYC verification was challenged as unconstitutional, citing the Supreme Court’s KS Puttaswamy judgment on privacy rights.

🔹 Gaming Ban Discriminatory: Senior Advocate Raghavachari questioned why offline gambling at clubs is allowed round-the-clock while online rummy is restricted.

State Defends Gaming Restrictions

Tamil Nadu’s Advocate General PS Raman argued that the ‘blank hour’ restriction is backed by expert studies, which found that youth gaming addiction peaks between 12 AM and 5 AM.

What’s Next?

The case is set for further hearing in two weeks, and the verdict could reshape online gaming laws in India, influencing state vs. central regulation, privacy concerns, and the legality of real money gaming restrictions.

Case Title: Play Games 24×7 Private Limited and Another v. State of Tamil Nadu (Batch cases)
Case No: WP 6784 of 2025

You Might Also Like

Omar Abdullah Mulls Legal Move for J&K Statehood: What It Means & Why It Matters

Sharjeel Imam Withdraws Plea Seeking Interim Bail to Contest Bihar Assembly Elections

Consumer Court Pulls Up Amazon for Delivering Wrong Product and Refusing Refund

Karnataka Approves One Paid Menstrual Leave Per Month for Women in Government and Private Sectors: A Landmark Step Towards Inclusive Workplaces

CCI Dismisses Complaint Alleging Use of Dirty Water in Maggi Sauce Production by Nestle India: No Competition Law Violation Found

TAGGED: Gaming Companies, Tamil Nadu’s ‘Blank Hour’ and KYC Rules in Court
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
Supreme Court

Motor Accident Compensation: Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Assessment in Sharad Singh v. HD Narang

Vanita Vanita October 1, 2025
Supreme Court’s Verdict on Governors and Presidential Assent: No Absolute Veto, Judicial Review Permissible
Supreme Court Flags Need for Performance Evaluation of High Court Judges: Highlights from Pila Pahan v. State of Jharkhand
PIL Filed in Supreme Court Against 20% Ethanol-Blended Petrol: Concerns Over Vehicle Safety and Consumer Rights
S.100 CPC | Supreme Court: High Courts Must Record Reasons Before Framing Additional Questions of Law in Second Appeals
lawferAd image
lexibalAd image

Categories

  • Supreme Court
  • Latest News Update
  • High Court
  • Article
  • know your lawyer

About US

Legally Present is an Indian legal news platform covering court judgments, legal rights, and insights for law professionals and students.
Quick Link
  • My Bookmark
  • InterestsNew
Top Categories
  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]

© Legally Present All Rights Reserved.