The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that a woman working in a State government institution cannot be denied paid maternity leave on the ground that she did not complete 80 days of service in the preceding year, ruling that constitutional welfare obligations override rigid technical application of eligibility conditions under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. The Court set aside an order denying honorarium during maternity leave to a contractual guest faculty member and directed payment for the statutory maternity benefit period.
The judgment was delivered by Justice Vishal Dhagat in a writ petition filed by Dr Priti Saket challenging modification of maternity leave benefits granted by Government Tilak PG College, Katni.
Case Title
Dr Priti Saket v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
(Writ Petition challenging denial of paid maternity leave honorarium)
Background of the Dispute
The petitioner, engaged as a contractual guest faculty member at Government Tilak PG College, Katni, had initially been granted six months of maternity leave with honorarium from April 5, 2023. However, the college administration subsequently issued a modified order dated June 16, 2023 withdrawing payment of honorarium and permitting only unpaid maternity leave.
The modification relied on a State government circular dated February 25, 2022 and the eligibility condition under Section 5(2) of the Maternity Benefit Act requiring completion of 80 days of work in the preceding 12 months.
Aggrieved by the withdrawal of financial benefits, the petitioner approached the High Court challenging the order as arbitrary and contrary to statutory protections available to women employees.
State Argues 80-Day Eligibility Requirement Not Satisfied
Opposing the petition, the State submitted that the petitioner was engaged on a contractual basis and did not enjoy the same service protections as regular employees. It was argued that Section 5(2) of the Maternity Benefit Act clearly prescribes completion of 80 days of service as a condition precedent for claiming maternity benefits.
According to the State, since the petitioner did not fulfil this requirement, the earlier order granting paid maternity leave had been correctly modified.
Court Holds 80-Day Bar Cannot Be Rigidly Applied to State Establishments
Rejecting the State’s submissions, the High Court held that the statutory condition requiring completion of 80 days of service cannot be invoked mechanically by government institutions to deny maternity benefits.
The Court observed:
Said bar of working 80 days in 12 months for availing benefit of grant of maternity leave shall not be applicable over establishment of State Government.
The Bench emphasised that government institutions carry a higher constitutional obligation to protect welfare of women employees and cannot rely on technical conditions to defeat maternity protections.
Directive Principles Must Guide Interpretation of Welfare Laws
The Court relied on the Directive Principles of State Policy under Article 38 of the Constitution of India, Article 39 of the Constitution of India and Article 39A of the Constitution of India to hold that statutory provisions relating to maternity benefits must be interpreted in a welfare-oriented manner.
The Court observed that India’s constitutional framework as a welfare state requires protection of dignity, health, and security of women workers, particularly during pregnancy and childbirth.
It noted that constitutional courts cannot ignore the spirit of Directive Principles while interpreting labour welfare legislation.
Maternity Benefit Act Applies Even to Contractual Employees
The High Court clarified that the definition of “establishment” under the Maternity Benefit Act includes government institutions employing ten or more persons. Accordingly, the Act applied to the petitioner despite her contractual status as guest faculty.
The Court held that denial of maternity benefits solely on the basis of contractual engagement would defeat the legislative purpose of the Act.
Court Directs Payment of 26 Weeks’ Maternity Leave
Allowing the petition, the High Court set aside the impugned order dated June 16, 2023 and directed authorities to grant maternity benefits in accordance with Section 5(1) of the Maternity Benefit Act.
The Court held that the petitioner was entitled to:
- 26 weeks of paid maternity leave
- eight weeks prior to delivery
- eighteen weeks after delivery
However, the Court clarified that any leave beyond the statutory 26-week entitlement would be treated as leave without pay.
Constitutional Welfare Obligations Override Technical Eligibility Bar
In a significant observation, the Court emphasised that the constitutional vision of social justice obligates the State to adopt a humane approach toward maternity benefits rather than a narrow technical interpretation of eligibility conditions.
The judgment reinforces the principle that maternity protection is not merely a statutory entitlement but part of the broader constitutional commitment to safeguarding dignity and welfare of women workers.
Significance of the Ruling
The decision strengthens maternity protection jurisprudence in India by clarifying that State government establishments cannot deny paid maternity leave solely on the basis of the 80-day service condition under Section 5(2) of the Maternity Benefit Act.
The ruling is likely to have implications for contractual and temporary employees working in government institutions across the country, particularly in cases where maternity benefits are denied on technical eligibility grounds.
Join Legally Present’s WhatsApp Community for latest news updates
Keywords: Madhya Pradesh High Court maternity leave 80 day rule, paid maternity leave government establishment India ruling
