Legally present
  • Home
  • Article
  • Latest News Update
  • Law Schools
  • Supreme Court
  • Weekly Digest
Reading: Punjab & Haryana High Court Imposes ₹5,000 Cost on Law Aspirant for Untenable Entrance Test Demand
Share
Legally present
  • Home
  • Latest News Update
  • Supreme Court
  • Article
  • know your lawyer
  • Weekly Digest
  • Home
  • Article
  • Latest News Update
  • Law Schools
  • Supreme Court
  • Weekly Digest
Follow US
Legally Present > High Court > Punjab & Haryana High Court Imposes ₹5,000 Cost on Law Aspirant for Untenable Entrance Test Demand
High Court

Punjab & Haryana High Court Imposes ₹5,000 Cost on Law Aspirant for Untenable Entrance Test Demand

Last updated: 2025/08/13 at 5:12 PM
Published August 13, 2025
Share
Punjab & Haryana High Court

Chandigarh– The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a petition filed by a B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) aspirant seeking a fresh entrance examination after he failed to appear for the scheduled test due to his own default. The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the case but imposed a cost of ₹5,000 for making an “untenable” legal demand.

Contents
Background of the PetitionCourt’s Observations and DecisionRepresentation

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor heard the matter involving Naman Sharma v. State of Haryana [CWP No. 22586 of 2025 (O&M)], decided on August 5, 2025.


Background of the Petition

The petitioner had sought either:

  • A special entrance examination to be conducted solely for him, or
  • Admission to the five-year B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) course without appearing in the entrance test, based on his academic record.

The Court noted that the petitioner’s inability to attend the scheduled examination was due to his own negligence and no fault of the examination authorities.


Court’s Observations and Decision

The Bench found the initial relief sought to be “wholly untenable in law” and stated that allowing such a prayer would set a dangerous precedent by undermining the uniform admission process.

When the petitioner later sought to withdraw the case, the Court permitted withdrawal but imposed a ₹5,000 cost, directing that the amount be deposited with the Punjab & Haryana High Court Bar Association, Chandigarh within 15 days.


Read more- Supreme Court Questions Justice Yashwant Varma Over Timing of Challenge to In-House Inquiry.

Representation

  • For the Petitioner: Advocate Sube S. Kaushik
  • For the Respondents: Deepak Balyan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana

Naman Sharma v. State of Haryana, CWP No. 22586 of 2025 (O & M), decided on 5-8-2025

You Might Also Like

Akshay Kumar Moves Bombay High Court to Safeguard His Personality Rights Amid Rise of Deepfakes and AI Misuse

Delhi High Court: Reckless Allegation of Infidelity Constitutes Cruelty Against Spouse

Delhi High Court Pulls Up Centre, Delhi Govt Over Delay in Implementing Transgender Reservation in Public Jobs

Bombay High Court Stresses Sympathy and Mental Health Treatment for Accused Battling Liquor and Drug Addiction | Key Directions

Madras High Court Condemns Vijay and TVK Leaders for ‘Fleeing’ Karur Stampede Site | Orders SIT Probe

TAGGED: Entrance Test Demand, Law Aspirant, Punjab & Haryana High Court
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Slams Inconsistent Judicial Decisions: Calls It a Threat to Public Trust and Judicial Discipline

Vanita Vanita May 1, 2025
Supreme Court Upholds Disability Rights in Medical Education: Orders AIIMS Board Review for NEET Topper with Limb Anomalies
“Atrocious, Violates Human Rights”: Supreme Court Slams Dubai Court’s Travel Ban on Minor Child in Custody Dispute
Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Husband Accused of Misrepresenting Profession: A Win for Legal Prudence
Supreme Court Orders Status Quo on Relocation of Yale Tomb at Madras High Court: A Clash Between Heritage and Practicality
lawferAd image
lexibalAd image

Categories

  • Supreme Court
  • Latest News Update
  • High Court
  • Article
  • know your lawyer

About US

Legally Present is an Indian legal news platform covering court judgments, legal rights, and insights for law professionals and students.
Quick Link
  • My Bookmark
  • InterestsNew
Top Categories
  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]

© Legally Present All Rights Reserved.