Legally present
  • Home
  • Article
  • Latest News Update
  • Law Schools
  • Supreme Court
  • Weekly Digest
Reading: Punjab & Haryana High Court Imposes ₹5,000 Cost on Law Aspirant for Untenable Entrance Test Demand
Share
Legally present
  • Home
  • Latest News Update
  • Supreme Court
  • Article
  • know your lawyer
  • Weekly Digest
  • Home
  • Article
  • Latest News Update
  • Law Schools
  • Supreme Court
  • Weekly Digest
Follow US
Legally Present > High Court > Punjab & Haryana High Court Imposes ₹5,000 Cost on Law Aspirant for Untenable Entrance Test Demand
High Court

Punjab & Haryana High Court Imposes ₹5,000 Cost on Law Aspirant for Untenable Entrance Test Demand

Last updated: 2025/08/13 at 5:12 PM
Published August 13, 2025
Share
Punjab & Haryana High Court

Chandigarh– The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a petition filed by a B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) aspirant seeking a fresh entrance examination after he failed to appear for the scheduled test due to his own default. The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the case but imposed a cost of ₹5,000 for making an “untenable” legal demand.

Contents
Background of the PetitionCourt’s Observations and DecisionRepresentation

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor heard the matter involving Naman Sharma v. State of Haryana [CWP No. 22586 of 2025 (O&M)], decided on August 5, 2025.


Background of the Petition

The petitioner had sought either:

  • A special entrance examination to be conducted solely for him, or
  • Admission to the five-year B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) course without appearing in the entrance test, based on his academic record.

The Court noted that the petitioner’s inability to attend the scheduled examination was due to his own negligence and no fault of the examination authorities.


Court’s Observations and Decision

The Bench found the initial relief sought to be “wholly untenable in law” and stated that allowing such a prayer would set a dangerous precedent by undermining the uniform admission process.

When the petitioner later sought to withdraw the case, the Court permitted withdrawal but imposed a ₹5,000 cost, directing that the amount be deposited with the Punjab & Haryana High Court Bar Association, Chandigarh within 15 days.


Read more- Supreme Court Questions Justice Yashwant Varma Over Timing of Challenge to In-House Inquiry.

Representation

  • For the Petitioner: Advocate Sube S. Kaushik
  • For the Respondents: Deepak Balyan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana

Naman Sharma v. State of Haryana, CWP No. 22586 of 2025 (O & M), decided on 5-8-2025

You Might Also Like

Gujarat High Court Expunges Strictures Against Registry in CCTV Installation Case, Upholds Chief Justice’s Supremacy in Administrative Matters

Himachal Pradesh High Court: Saying ‘Pakistan Zindabad’ Is Not Sedition Unless India Is Denounced

Bombay High Court to Watch Movie Ajey on Yogi Adityanath Before Deciding Censorship Row

Family Disapproval Cannot Override Freedom of Two Adults to Choose Each Other: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court Grants Hero MotoCorp Interim Relief in Trademark Dispute Over ‘Destiny’ Electric Scooters

TAGGED: Entrance Test Demand, Law Aspirant, Punjab & Haryana High Court
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Asserts Constitution’s Supremacy Over Parliament, Reaffirms Judicial Review as a Core Constitutional Function

Vanita Vanita May 9, 2025
Section 22 Specific Relief Act | Refund Of Advance Payment Cannot Be Granted Without Specific Prayer In Plaint: Supreme Court
Mere Use of Insulting Remarks Like ‘Impotent’ Not Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Husband’s In-Laws
Supreme Court Empowers Arbitral Tribunals to Implead Non-Signatories Under Group of Companies Doctrine
Supreme Court: Suit Can Be Dismissed As Time-Barred Even If No Specific Issue On Limitation Was Framed
lawferAd image
lexibalAd image

Categories

  • Supreme Court
  • Latest News Update
  • Article
  • High Court
  • know your lawyer

About US

Legally Present is an Indian legal news platform covering court judgments, legal rights, and insights for law professionals and students.
Quick Link
  • My Bookmark
  • InterestsNew
Top Categories
  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]

© Legally Present All Rights Reserved.