Legally present
  • Home
  • Article
  • Latest News Update
  • Law Schools
  • Supreme Court
  • Weekly Digest
Reading: Genuine Cultivators Should Not Be Made To Suffer: Supreme Court Declares Plantation Vested With Kerala Govt As Not Private Forest
Share
Legally present
  • Home
  • Latest News Update
  • Supreme Court
  • Article
  • know your lawyer
  • Weekly Digest
  • Home
  • Article
  • Latest News Update
  • Law Schools
  • Supreme Court
  • Weekly Digest
Follow US
Legally Present > Supreme Court > Genuine Cultivators Should Not Be Made To Suffer: Supreme Court Declares Plantation Vested With Kerala Govt As Not Private Forest
Supreme Court

Genuine Cultivators Should Not Be Made To Suffer: Supreme Court Declares Plantation Vested With Kerala Govt As Not Private Forest

Last updated: 2025/10/22 at 6:09 PM
Published October 22, 2025
Share

In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the rights of genuine cultivators under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971. In the case of M. Jameela v. State of Kerala and others (2025 LiveLaw SC 1023), the Court declared that 37.5 acres of land in South Wayanad, cultivated with coffee and cardamom, is private plantation land and not a vested forest under the Kerala State Act.

Contents
Case BackgroundSupreme Court’s FindingsCourt’s ObservationsJudgment OutcomeSignificance of the Judgment

Case Background

The dispute arose over whether the land in question constituted a private forest vested with the State of Kerala. The appellant, M. Jameela, claimed ownership and possession of the land, asserting that it had been developed as coffee and cardamom plantations well before 1971. The Forest Department, however, contended that the land had vested with the State as a forest under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971.

Supreme Court’s Findings

The Supreme Court examined historical records, statutory registrations, expert testimony, and government documentation to arrive at its decision. Key findings include:

  • Historical Cultivation: The Court noted that the land had been cleared and converted into coffee and cardamom plantations as early as 1957 by the original owner, Parappu Mappilakath Imbichi Ahmed, with permission from the District Collector under the Madras Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949.
  • Registration with Statutory Boards: The plantations were duly registered with the Coffee Board and the Cardamom Board prior to the appointed day (May 10, 1971), with registration certificates issued on June 30, 1971.
  • Expert Evidence: The Court relied on findings of the Advocate Commissioner and a Coffee Board expert, who estimated the age of several coffee plants at 40–42 years as of 2007, indicating mid-1960s plantation.
  • Tax and Revenue Records: The land had consistently been treated as a plantation by government authorities.
  • Forest Department Actions: Initially, the Forest Department had excluded the land from vested forest demarcation. However, decades later, the State attempted to claim about 8.25 acres as Government land without convincing justification.

Court’s Observations

The Supreme Court observed that “genuine cultivators should not be made to fight a prolonged battle to vindicate rights that are apparent from the public records.” It criticized the Forest Tribunal and the Kerala High Court for adopting a “technical and overly skeptical” approach, calling their findings “manifestly unsustainable.”

The Court emphasized that the presence of young plants in a plantation in 2007 did not imply the area was barren in 1971, noting that plantations are dynamic with older plants replaced by new ones.

Judgment Outcome

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, declaring M. Jameela as the lawful owner in possession of the property. The Court directed the State of Kerala and the Custodian of Vested Forests to correct boundary records within six weeks.

The Court concluded that the entire 37.5 acres of land falls under the exemption provisions of Sections 3(2) and 3(3) of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, as lands under bona fide coffee and cardamom plantations existing prior to the appointed day.

Significance of the Judgment

This judgment reaffirms the legal protections for genuine cultivators and clarifies the scope of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act. By highlighting that bona fide cultivation prior to the appointed day exempts land from vesting with the State, the Supreme Court has provided a crucial precedent for similar cases across Kerala and other states with vested forest legislations.

The ruling serves as a reminder that landowners and cultivators maintaining plantations in good faith cannot be unduly deprived of their rights, and public records must be given due weight in determining ownership.

Also Read

Bombay High Court Appoints High Powered Committee to Protect Sanjay Gandhi National Park

Delhi High Court Restrains Use of ‘WOW BURGER’, Upholds WOW Momo’s Trademark Rights

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Orders Preservation of CCTV Footage and Medical Records in Mumbai Custodial Death Case

Supreme Court Summons Haryana Authority Over Illegal Tree Felling to Give Access to BJP’s Karnal Office; Orders Status Quo

Supreme Court of India Warns Against Undue Leniency and Excessive Harshness in Sentencing: Calls for Balance and Proportionality in Criminal Justice

Supreme Court Praises Enforcement Directorate for Restitution of Flats to 213 Delayed Homebuyers

Supreme Court Orders Government to Pay Bail Surety for Poor Under-trial Prisoners: A Landmark Step for Access to Justice

TAGGED: Genuine Cultivators, Kerala Govt., Supreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Telegram
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]
Popular News
Article

“Mediation Is a Wiser Form of Justice”: CJI Sanjiv Khanna at Launch of Mediation Association of India

Vanita Vanita May 4, 2025
Supreme Court Directs Petitioners Challenging Hindu Religious Endowments Acts in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh & Telangana to Approach High Courts
CBI Court Acquits Former High Court Judge Nirmal Yadav in ₹15 Lakh Cash Case
TET Mandate Shouldn’t Apply to Pre-2010 Teachers: Tamil Nadu Govt Moves Supreme Court with Review Petition
Supreme Court Lauds Justice AM Sapre for Declining ₹20 Lakh Payment in Tea Workers’ Wage Dispute
lawferAd image
lexibalAd image

Categories

  • Supreme Court
  • Latest News Update
  • High Court
  • Article
  • know your lawyer

About US

Legally Present is an Indian legal news platform covering court judgments, legal rights, and insights for law professionals and students.
Quick Link
  • My Bookmark
  • InterestsNew
Top Categories
  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]

© Legally Present All Rights Reserved.